Triple
T4384840
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Time-Triggered Ethernet |
E99216
|
entity |
| Predicate | canCoexistWith |
P56284
|
FINISHED |
| Object | event-triggered traffic |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: event-triggered traffic | Statement: [Time-Triggered Ethernet, canCoexistWith, event-triggered traffic]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: canCoexistWith Context triple: [Time-Triggered Ethernet, canCoexistWith, event-triggered traffic]
-
A.
canAlsoBe
Indicates that something has an additional possible state, role, or classification beyond its primary one.
-
B.
canLiaiseWith
Indicates that one entity is able or permitted to communicate and coordinate directly with another entity for collaboration or information exchange.
-
C.
coexistsWithLanguage
Indicates that one entity exists or functions alongside a particular language at the same time, without excluding or replacing it.
-
D.
canExistAt
Indicates that an entity is capable of being present or occurring at a specified location, time, or context.
-
E.
canBelongTo
Indicates that something is capable of being a member or part of a particular group, category, or owner.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (4 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69b3454f739481909ff6c28331f0c0b9 |
completed | March 12, 2026, 10:59 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69b35264e44c81908dd0e0a81f1353bb |
completed | March 12, 2026, 11:55 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69b34f572efc8190bad1e5078cbcb75a |
completed | March 12, 2026, 11:42 p.m. |
| PDg | Predicate description generation | batch_69b3501834448190bedf775a80da4778 |
completed | March 12, 2026, 11:45 p.m. |
Created at: March 12, 2026, 11:19 p.m.