Triple
T4384764
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Lindl. |
E99214
|
entity |
| Predicate | governingDiscipline |
P56283
|
FINISHED |
| Object | systematic botany |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: systematic botany | Statement: [Lindl., governingDiscipline, systematic botany]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: governingDiscipline Context triple: [Lindl., governingDiscipline, systematic botany]
-
A.
subDisciplineOf
Indicates that one discipline is a more specialized or narrower field within another, broader discipline.
-
B.
disciplineDefinedAs
Indicates that one discipline is formally characterized, described, or specified in terms of another concept, framework, or definition.
-
C.
typeDiscipline
Indicates that an entity is associated with, categorized under, or characterized by a particular discipline or field of study.
-
D.
associatedWithDiscipline
Indicates that an entity has a relevant connection or involvement with a particular academic, professional, or thematic discipline.
-
E.
supportsDiscipline
Indicates that one entity provides assistance, resources, or endorsement that helps sustain or advance a particular discipline.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (4 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69b3454f739481909ff6c28331f0c0b9 |
completed | March 12, 2026, 10:59 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69b35264e44c81908dd0e0a81f1353bb |
completed | March 12, 2026, 11:55 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69b34f572efc8190bad1e5078cbcb75a |
completed | March 12, 2026, 11:42 p.m. |
| PDg | Predicate description generation | batch_69b3501834448190bedf775a80da4778 |
completed | March 12, 2026, 11:45 p.m. |
Created at: March 12, 2026, 11:19 p.m.