Triple

T4371224
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Something’s Burning E98899 entity
Predicate hasProductionFeature P54468 FINISHED
Object lush arrangement LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: lush arrangement | Statement: [Something’s Burning, hasProductionFeature, lush arrangement]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hasProductionFeature
Context triple: [Something’s Burning, hasProductionFeature, lush arrangement]
  • A. hasFeatureCode
    Indicates that an entity is associated with a specific feature identifier or code that characterizes one of its properties or attributes.
  • B. hasProduction
    Indicates that an entity is associated with, or responsible for, the creation or manufacture of another entity or product.
  • C. hasFeature
    Indicates that an entity possesses, exhibits, or includes a particular characteristic, attribute, or component.
  • D. hasProductionAspect chosen
    Indicates that something possesses or involves a particular aspect, feature, or characteristic related to its production process or creation.
  • E. hasProductionFormat
    Indicates that an entity is associated with, or presented in, a particular production or media format.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69b3454db3708190aeafd814413c4c3d completed March 12, 2026, 10:59 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69b3521dffbc8190b9300a7f4f64bdc0 completed March 12, 2026, 11:54 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69b34f53e3cc8190bf5d4dbe2413bf65 completed March 12, 2026, 11:42 p.m.
Created at: March 12, 2026, 11:17 p.m.