Triple

T4370454
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Hyundai Kona E98881 entity
Predicate competitor P1375 FINISHED
Object Mazda CX-30 E396579 NE FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Mazda CX-30 | Statement: [Hyundai Kona, competitor, Mazda CX-30]
NED1 Entity disambiguation (via context triple) gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Mazda CX-30
Context triple: [Hyundai Kona, competitor, Mazda CX-30]
  • A. Mazda CX-30 chosen
    The Mazda CX-30 is a compact crossover SUV known for its sleek design, upscale interior, and engaging driving dynamics within Mazda’s lineup.
  • B. Mazda CX-5
    The Mazda CX-5 is a compact crossover SUV known for its stylish design, engaging driving dynamics, and efficient Skyactiv technology.
  • C. Mazda3
    The Mazda3 is a popular compact car known for its sporty handling, stylish design, and well-appointed interior.
  • D. Mazda2
    The Mazda2 is a subcompact car known for its agile handling, fuel efficiency, and stylish design, positioned as an affordable entry-level model in Mazda’s lineup.
  • E. Mazda CX-9
    The Mazda CX-9 is a mid-size three-row crossover SUV known for its stylish design, upscale interior, and engaging driving dynamics.
  • F. None of above.
  • G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69b3454db3708190aeafd814413c4c3d completed March 12, 2026, 10:59 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69b3521cb7ec8190b7b79675871d97d8 completed March 12, 2026, 11:54 p.m.
NED1 Entity disambiguation (via context triple) batch_69b5e50bcc9481909b0b9d60198dce63 completed March 14, 2026, 10:45 p.m.
Created at: March 12, 2026, 11:17 p.m.