Triple
T4367602
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Garland, Texas |
E98814
|
entity |
| Predicate | adjacentTo |
P224
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Sachse, Texas |
E308263
|
NE FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Sachse, Texas | Statement: [Garland, Texas, adjacentTo, Sachse, Texas]
NED1
Entity disambiguation (via context triple)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Sachse, Texas Context triple: [Garland, Texas, adjacentTo, Sachse, Texas]
-
A.
Sachse, Texas
chosen
Sachse, Texas is a suburban city in the Dallas–Fort Worth metropolitan area known for its residential communities and proximity to major North Texas employment and retail centers.
-
B.
Sanger, Texas
Sanger, Texas is a small city in Denton County known for its rural character and proximity to outdoor recreation at Ray Roberts Lake.
-
C.
Saginaw, Texas
Saginaw, Texas is a suburban city in the Dallas–Fort Worth metropolitan area known for its strong railroad heritage and grain elevator industry.
-
D.
Navasota, Texas
Navasota, Texas is a small city in Grimes County that serves as a historic railroad and commercial hub within the Greater Houston metropolitan area.
-
E.
Alexander, Texas
Alexander, Texas is a small unincorporated rural community located in Erath County in north-central Texas.
- F. None of above.
- G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69b3454db3708190aeafd814413c4c3d |
completed | March 12, 2026, 10:59 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69b35201be7081908808e81634060f95 |
completed | March 12, 2026, 11:53 p.m. |
| NED1 | Entity disambiguation (via context triple) | batch_69bfb12cd0e4819082403092672f9fe8 |
completed | March 22, 2026, 9:06 a.m. |
Created at: March 12, 2026, 11:17 p.m.