Triple

T4363905
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Burney Falls E98724 entity
Predicate viewingFacilities P55786 FINISHED
Object overlook LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: overlook | Statement: [Burney Falls, viewingFacilities, overlook]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: viewingFacilities
Context triple: [Burney Falls, viewingFacilities, overlook]
  • A. findingOnFacilities
    Indicates a relationship where an inspection or assessment identifies a specific issue, observation, or result associated with particular facilities.
  • B. associatedSpaceFacility
    Indicates that there is a relationship linking an entity to a specific space-related facility with which it is connected or involved.
  • C. servesFacility
    Indicates that one entity provides services or support to a particular facility as its client, target, or area of operation.
  • D. userFacility
    Indicates a relationship where a user is associated with, has access to, or operates within a particular facility.
  • E. hasFacilities
    Indicates that an entity possesses, provides, or is equipped with certain facilities or physical resources.
  • F. None of above. chosen

Provenance (4 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69b3454c772081908e20173e379e8ebe completed March 12, 2026, 10:59 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69b351e70a748190af6f1b709a0e75e6 completed March 12, 2026, 11:53 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69b34f53e3cc8190bf5d4dbe2413bf65 completed March 12, 2026, 11:42 p.m.
PDg Predicate description generation batch_69b34ff654308190b9717526120d80d3 completed March 12, 2026, 11:44 p.m.
Created at: March 12, 2026, 11:16 p.m.