Triple
T4352020
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Curtiss-Wright XLR25 |
E98047
|
entity |
| Predicate | oxidizerState |
P55712
|
FINISHED |
| Object | liquid |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: liquid | Statement: [Curtiss-Wright XLR25, oxidizerState, liquid]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: oxidizerState Context triple: [Curtiss-Wright XLR25, oxidizerState, liquid]
-
A.
oxidizer
Indicates a relationship where one entity acts as an oxidizing agent that accepts electrons from, or promotes the oxidation of, another entity in a chemical process.
-
B.
oxidationLevel
Indicates the degree to which an entity has undergone oxidation, typically reflecting its loss of electrons or increase in oxidation state.
-
C.
oxidationStates
Indicates the specific oxidation numbers assigned to an element or atom within a chemical species, reflecting its electron loss or gain state in that context.
-
D.
secondaryOxidationStateInSolution
Indicates the oxidation state an element or species commonly adopts as a secondary (non-primary) state when dissolved in a given solution.
-
E.
predominantOxidationStateInSolution
Indicates the oxidation state that a chemical species most commonly or primarily adopts when present in a given solution.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (4 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69b3454965f881908c41190bb22f0e4b |
completed | March 12, 2026, 10:59 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69b351ab03488190a8900de98fb4a00e |
completed | March 12, 2026, 11:52 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69b34f51ed7c8190b7bf5f44b56b730d |
completed | March 12, 2026, 11:42 p.m. |
| PDg | Predicate description generation | batch_69b34ff654308190b9717526120d80d3 |
completed | March 12, 2026, 11:44 p.m. |
Created at: March 12, 2026, 11:15 p.m.