Triple
T43465
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | The Death of Socrates |
E854
|
entity |
| Predicate | philosophicalTheme |
P3051
|
FINISHED |
| Object | rational acceptance of death |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: rational acceptance of death | Statement: [The Death of Socrates, philosophicalTheme, rational acceptance of death]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: philosophicalTheme Context triple: [The Death of Socrates, philosophicalTheme, rational acceptance of death]
-
A.
notablePhilosopher
Indicates that the subject is recognized as a philosopher of particular significance or influence.
-
B.
ontologicalAspect
Indicates a fundamental mode or category of being that characterizes how something exists or is realized.
-
C.
designPhilosophy
Indicates the guiding principles, values, or conceptual approach that shape how something is designed or created.
-
D.
theme
Indicates the entity that is the primary participant or content affected or characterized by an action, event, or state.
-
E.
ethicalDebate
Indicates a relationship where parties are engaged in discussing, questioning, or disputing the moral rightness or wrongness of actions, policies, or principles.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (4 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69a247a8f6c08190bac804906d62ed5a |
completed | Feb. 28, 2026, 1:40 a.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69a24c083ad081909c1122c8fb29efdc |
completed | Feb. 28, 2026, 1:59 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69a24aba9a2c81909f769a8f22e30c92 |
completed | Feb. 28, 2026, 1:54 a.m. |
| PDg | Predicate description generation | batch_69a24c0794c0819095509d970e05fc0f |
completed | Feb. 28, 2026, 1:59 a.m. |
Created at: Feb. 28, 2026, 1:46 a.m.