Triple
T4329235
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Manx law |
E96707
|
entity |
| Predicate | civilLawBasedOn |
P55585
|
FINISHED |
| Object | common law principles |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: common law principles | Statement: [Manx law, civilLawBasedOn, common law principles]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: civilLawBasedOn Context triple: [Manx law, civilLawBasedOn, common law principles]
-
A.
haveCivilLaw
Indicates that an entity is subject to, governed by, or operates under a civil law legal system.
-
B.
customaryLaw
Indicates that a relationship, behavior, or rule is governed by unwritten, traditional norms and practices recognized as binding within a community or group.
-
C.
legalSystem
Indicates the formal framework of laws, rules, and institutions that governs how legal matters are defined, interpreted, and enforced within a society or jurisdiction.
-
D.
legalDoctrine
Indicates that one legal principle, rule, or theory is being applied, referenced, or relied upon as an authoritative basis for interpreting or deciding a legal issue.
-
E.
relatedLegalSystem
Indicates that there is an association or connection between two legal systems, such as influence, similarity, shared origin, or mutual relevance.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (4 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69b34542fd908190b11b08faad8decfd |
completed | March 12, 2026, 10:59 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69b3513545fc81909e29de7eae1829f7 |
completed | March 12, 2026, 11:50 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69b34f4e13fc8190a42c519f37959d27 |
completed | March 12, 2026, 11:42 p.m. |
| PDg | Predicate description generation | batch_69b34ff654308190b9717526120d80d3 |
completed | March 12, 2026, 11:44 p.m. |
Created at: March 12, 2026, 11:13 p.m.