Triple
T4328528
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Constitutional Reform and Governance Act 2010 |
E96689
|
entity |
| Predicate | modernises |
P4337
|
FINISHED |
| Object | United Kingdom constitutional arrangements |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: United Kingdom constitutional arrangements | Statement: [Constitutional Reform and Governance Act 2010, modernises, United Kingdom constitutional arrangements]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: modernises Context triple: [Constitutional Reform and Governance Act 2010, modernises, United Kingdom constitutional arrangements]
-
A.
modernizedFor
Indicates that something has been updated, adapted, or improved to suit more recent standards, technologies, or conditions.
-
B.
modernization
chosen
Indicates a process by which something is updated, reformed, or transformed to align with contemporary standards, technologies, or practices.
-
C.
modernUse
Indicates how something is currently used or applied in modern times.
-
D.
modernizationType
Indicates the specific kind or category of modernization applied to an entity or system.
-
E.
modernizedBy
Indicates that an entity has been updated, improved, or brought up to modern standards through the actions or influence of another entity.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69b34542fd908190b11b08faad8decfd |
completed | March 12, 2026, 10:59 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69b35133688c8190ab5527ae01748f13 |
completed | March 12, 2026, 11:50 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69b34f4e13fc8190a42c519f37959d27 |
completed | March 12, 2026, 11:42 p.m. |
Created at: March 12, 2026, 11:13 p.m.