Triple
T4322477
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Penutian phylum |
E96550
|
entity |
| Predicate | instanceOf |
P0
|
FINISHED |
| Object | hypothetical language phylum |
C14762
|
CONCEPT FINISHED |
How this triple was built (1 step)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
CD
Concept disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target class: hypothetical language phylum Context triple: [Penutian phylum, instanceOf, hypothetical language phylum]
-
A.
hypothesized language group
chosen
A hypothesized language group is a proposed set of languages believed to share a common ancestor based on comparative evidence, but whose genetic relationship has not yet been conclusively demonstrated or widely accepted.
-
B.
reconstructed language
A reconstructed language is a hypothesized earlier form of a language or language family, systematically inferred by linguists from patterns in its descendant or related languages.
-
C.
polysynthetic language
A polysynthetic language is a type of language in which words are typically formed by combining many morphemes to express what would require entire phrases or sentences in less synthetic languages.
-
D.
Zenati language
The Zenati language is a conceptual class representing a branch of Berber languages characterized by shared phonological, morphological, and lexical features that distinguish it from other Afroasiatic language groups.
-
E.
constructed language variety
A constructed language variety is a deliberately designed form of language—such as a dialect, sociolect, or register—created or modified for specific purposes, contexts, or communities rather than arising solely through natural linguistic evolution.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (1 batch)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69b345422aac81909ddbadae437d122e |
completed | March 12, 2026, 10:59 p.m. |
Created at: March 12, 2026, 11:12 p.m.