Triple

T4322468
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Oregon Coast Penutian E96549 entity
Predicate debatedAspect P14608 FINISHED
Object validity of the subgroup LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: validity of the subgroup | Statement: [Oregon Coast Penutian, debatedAspect, validity of the subgroup]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: debatedAspect
Context triple: [Oregon Coast Penutian, debatedAspect, validity of the subgroup]
  • A. disputedAspect chosen
    Indicates that a particular feature, detail, or component of something is subject to disagreement or contention between parties.
  • B. partOfDebate
    Indicates that one entity is a component, segment, or participant within a larger debate or argumentative exchange.
  • C. inAcademicDebate
    Indicates that one entity is engaged in a formal, scholarly argument or discussion with another entity, typically following academic norms and methods of reasoning.
  • D. relatedToDebate
    Indicates a relationship in which something is connected or relevant to a debate, discussion, or argumentative exchange.
  • E. disputed
    Indicates that there is active disagreement or contestation over the validity, ownership, interpretation, or status of the relationship or claim between the entities.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69b345422aac81909ddbadae437d122e completed March 12, 2026, 10:59 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69b351177eb88190b89fa49a88add5e8 completed March 12, 2026, 11:49 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69b34f4bec888190987fc2631498b637 completed March 12, 2026, 11:42 p.m.
Created at: March 12, 2026, 11:12 p.m.