Triple
T4318532
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Member of Parliament |
E96452
|
entity |
| Predicate | isAccountableThrough |
P24325
|
FINISHED |
| Object | elections |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: elections | Statement: [Member of Parliament, isAccountableThrough, elections]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: isAccountableThrough Context triple: [Member of Parliament, isAccountableThrough, elections]
-
A.
accountableThrough
chosen
Indicates that one entity bears responsibility or can be held answerable by means of, or via the mechanism provided by, another entity or process.
-
B.
containsAccountOf
Indicates that one entity includes, records, or holds information about another entity’s account.
-
C.
accountabilityTo
Indicates that one entity is responsible for explaining, justifying, or answering for its actions, decisions, or outcomes to another entity.
-
D.
isBillingAuthorityFor
Indicates that one entity has the official responsibility and authority to issue bills or invoices to another entity or on its behalf.
-
E.
responsibleFor
Indicates that one entity has a duty, obligation, or role to manage, oversee, or be accountable for another entity or outcome.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69b345422aac81909ddbadae437d122e |
completed | March 12, 2026, 10:59 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69b350f883c88190a2d72f7d124eef43 |
completed | March 12, 2026, 11:49 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69b34f4bec888190987fc2631498b637 |
completed | March 12, 2026, 11:42 p.m. |
Created at: March 12, 2026, 11:12 p.m.