Triple
T4314389
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Countess of Chatham |
E94152
|
entity |
| Predicate | genderForTitleHolder |
P34342
|
FINISHED |
| Object | female |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: female | Statement: [Countess of Chatham, genderForTitleHolder, female]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: genderForTitleHolder Context triple: [Countess of Chatham, genderForTitleHolder, female]
-
A.
genderOfFirstHolder
Indicates that the relationship specifies the gender of the first entity that holds or possesses something in the described context.
-
B.
hasGenderedTitle
Indicates that an entity is associated with a title or form of address that is explicitly marked for a particular gender.
-
C.
genderRule
Indicates a rule or constraint that determines how gender-related properties or classifications should be assigned or interpreted in a given context.
-
D.
genderDivision
Indicates a relationship where roles, responsibilities, or categories are separated or distinguished based on gender.
-
E.
genderOfTypicalHolder
chosen
Indicates the gender that is most commonly associated with or typical of the usual holder of something.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69b3451886588190a3dd1305ea7c58dc |
completed | March 12, 2026, 10:58 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69b350f4448481908be2c7df9cc71bb9 |
completed | March 12, 2026, 11:49 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69b34f4a07b08190a06ada0d9cbb14fb |
completed | March 12, 2026, 11:42 p.m. |
Created at: March 12, 2026, 11:12 p.m.