Triple

T4297134
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Proto-Austronesian E99741 entity
Predicate hasReconstructionMethod P30323 FINISHED
Object comparative method LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: comparative method | Statement: [Proto-Austronesian, hasReconstructionMethod, comparative method]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hasReconstructionMethod
Context triple: [Proto-Austronesian, hasReconstructionMethod, comparative method]
  • A. reconstructionMethod chosen
    Indicates the technique or process used to reconstruct, restore, or rebuild something from its original or fragmented state.
  • B. hasReconstructionStandard
    Indicates that something is associated with or governed by a specific standard or guideline for how it should be reconstructed.
  • C. hasReconstructionLevel
    Indicates the degree or stage to which something has been rebuilt, restored, or reconstructed.
  • D. hasAnimatedReconstruction
    Indicates that an entity is associated with an animated reconstruction depicting it or one of its states or events.
  • E. hasReconstructionWork
    Indicates that an entity is undergoing, has undergone, or is associated with reconstruction or restoration work.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69b3455175088190aa79c6e03b86647e completed March 12, 2026, 10:59 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69b3509aebd48190af38f2e37f07869a completed March 12, 2026, 11:47 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69b347fe55a88190b77bab0c0f38e1aa completed March 12, 2026, 11:10 p.m.
Created at: March 12, 2026, 11:08 p.m.