Triple
T4293668
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | A3C |
E99656
|
entity |
| Predicate | supportsParallelism |
P34884
|
FINISHED |
| Object | true |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: true | Statement: [A3C, supportsParallelism, true]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: supportsParallelism Context triple: [A3C, supportsParallelism, true]
-
A.
isParallelizable
chosen
Indicates that a process, task, or operation can be decomposed into independent parts that may be executed concurrently without affecting correctness.
-
B.
supportsParallelEncryption
Indicates that the subject is capable of performing encryption operations in parallel, rather than strictly sequentially.
-
C.
supportsParallelDecryption
Indicates that one entity enables or is compatible with decrypting multiple items or data streams simultaneously.
-
D.
supportsMultipleStreams
Indicates that the subject is capable of handling or maintaining more than one data or communication stream at the same time.
-
E.
supportedParadigm
Indicates that one entity (such as a tool, language, or system) provides functionality or features that enable or are compatible with a particular paradigm or methodological approach.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69b3455175088190aa79c6e03b86647e |
completed | March 12, 2026, 10:59 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69b35082228081908504e3fd7c4ca1e8 |
completed | March 12, 2026, 11:47 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69b347fe55a88190b77bab0c0f38e1aa |
completed | March 12, 2026, 11:10 p.m. |
Created at: March 12, 2026, 11:08 p.m.