Triple
T4291270
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | 568 Group |
E99596
|
entity |
| Predicate | collaborativePractice |
P42125
|
FINISHED |
| Object | sharing common principles for need analysis |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: sharing common principles for need analysis | Statement: [568 Group, collaborativePractice, sharing common principles for need analysis]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: collaborativePractice Context triple: [568 Group, collaborativePractice, sharing common principles for need analysis]
-
A.
collaborationOf
Indicates a relationship in which two or more entities work together jointly toward a shared goal or outcome.
-
B.
collaborationAspect
chosen
Indicates a specific characteristic, dimension, or feature of how entities collaborate or work together.
-
C.
collaborationArea
Indicates the domain, topic, or field in which two or more entities work together or collaborate.
-
D.
mentionsPractice
Indicates that one entity refers to, discusses, or brings up a particular practice in some form of communication.
-
E.
isCollaboration
Indicates that two or more entities are jointly working together toward a shared goal or producing something in partnership.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69b3455175088190aa79c6e03b86647e |
completed | March 12, 2026, 10:59 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69b3507efb28819091a9d5b9161a5008 |
completed | March 12, 2026, 11:47 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69b347fc4c0c8190a7fcd814e27308a5 |
completed | March 12, 2026, 11:10 p.m. |
Created at: March 12, 2026, 11:08 p.m.