Triple

T4289032
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Article III of the United States Constitution E97340 entity
Predicate interpretedIn P2252 FINISHED
Object Martin v. Hunter's Lessee E383001 NE FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Martin v. Hunter's Lessee | Statement: [Article III of the United States Constitution, interpretedIn, Martin v. Hunter's Lessee]
NED1 Entity disambiguation (via context triple) gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07 
Target entity: Martin v. Hunter's Lessee
Context triple: [Article III of the United States Constitution, interpretedIn, Martin v. Hunter's Lessee]
  • A. Martin v. Hunter's Lessee chosen
    Martin v. Hunter's Lessee is an 1816 U.S. Supreme Court case that established the Court's authority to review state court decisions on federal law, reinforcing federal judicial supremacy.
  • B. Chisholm v. Georgia
    Chisholm v. Georgia was a 1793 U.S. Supreme Court case that held a state could be sued in federal court by a citizen of another state, a ruling that led directly to the adoption of the Eleventh Amendment limiting such suits.
  • C. Gibbons v. Ogden
    Gibbons v. Ogden was an 1824 U.S. Supreme Court case that broadly affirmed federal power over interstate commerce, significantly strengthening national authority relative to the states.
  • D. Fletcher v. Peck
    Fletcher v. Peck was an 1810 U.S. Supreme Court decision that for the first time struck down a state law as unconstitutional, helping define the scope of the Contract Clause and judicial review over state legislation.
  • E. Dred Scott v. Sandford
    Dred Scott v. Sandford was an 1857 U.S. Supreme Court decision that infamously denied citizenship and constitutional rights to African Americans and helped accelerate tensions leading to the Civil War.
  • F. None of above.
  • G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69b3454595848190a0e6bbb6a2bea040 completed March 12, 2026, 10:59 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69b35060b70081908479c95b2afe8ec5 completed March 12, 2026, 11:46 p.m.
NED1 Entity disambiguation (via context triple) batch_69b5c7307e3481909dfb55018f359589 completed March 14, 2026, 8:38 p.m.
Created at: March 12, 2026, 11:08 p.m.