Triple
T4279306
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | PL/Tcl |
E97111
|
entity |
| Predicate | trustedVariantRestricts |
P28907
|
FINISHED |
| Object | access to file system |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: access to file system | Statement: [PL/Tcl, trustedVariantRestricts, access to file system]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: trustedVariantRestricts Context triple: [PL/Tcl, trustedVariantRestricts, access to file system]
-
A.
securedVariant
Indicates that one entity is a security-enhanced or more protected version of another entity.
-
B.
hasSemanticRestriction
chosen
Indicates that a concept or relation is constrained in meaning or usage by specific semantic conditions or limitations.
-
C.
trustAnchoredVia
Indicates that a relationship of trust is established or justified through a specific intermediary or anchoring mechanism (such as a trusted authority, key, or certificate).
-
D.
trustPurpose
Indicates that one entity has a specific intended use, goal, or objective for which a trust or trusted arrangement is established with another entity.
-
E.
protectedBy
Indicates that one entity provides protection, defense, or safeguarding for another entity.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69b34544be3c819084d1ab82d29f90c5 |
completed | March 12, 2026, 10:59 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69b350367da48190b735deef9b5d2d2e |
completed | March 12, 2026, 11:45 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69b347faa45481908c19c29fb906dc92 |
completed | March 12, 2026, 11:10 p.m. |
Created at: March 12, 2026, 11:07 p.m.