Triple

T4276416
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject ASGI E97055 entity
Predicate supportsConcurrencyModel P12989 FINISHED
Object asyncio LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: asyncio | Statement: [ASGI, supportsConcurrencyModel, asyncio]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: supportsConcurrencyModel
Context triple: [ASGI, supportsConcurrencyModel, asyncio]
  • A. hasConcurrencyConstruct chosen
    Indicates that something includes or utilizes a construct or mechanism for executing multiple operations or tasks concurrently.
  • B. concurrentModel
    Indicates that two or more processes, activities, or states occur or are valid at the same time, potentially interacting or overlapping in execution.
  • C. requiresConcurrenceWith
    Indicates that one action, decision, or condition must be agreed upon or approved by another specified party or entity before it can proceed or be valid.
  • D. heldConcurrentlyWith
    Indicates that two or more events, roles, or states occurred or were in effect at the same time.
  • E. mayBeHeldConcurrentlyWith
    Indicates that one event, state, or condition is allowed to occur or be in effect at the same time as another without conflict or violation of constraints.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69b34544be3c819084d1ab82d29f90c5 completed March 12, 2026, 10:59 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69b3501d677481909e7416a1d2b0008c completed March 12, 2026, 11:45 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69b347faa45481908c19c29fb906dc92 completed March 12, 2026, 11:10 p.m.
Created at: March 12, 2026, 11:07 p.m.