Triple
T4272381
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Pomo people |
E96968
|
entity |
| Predicate | hasLanguage |
P15
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Central Pomo language |
E418980
|
NE FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Central Pomo language | Statement: [Pomo people, hasLanguage, Central Pomo language]
NED1
Entity disambiguation (via context triple)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Central Pomo language Context triple: [Pomo people, hasLanguage, Central Pomo language]
-
A.
Southeastern Pomo
Southeastern Pomo is one of the distinct Pomoan languages traditionally spoken by the Pomo people of Northern California.
-
B.
Northeastern Pomo
Northeastern Pomo is an extinct, historically spoken Native American language variety of the Pomoan family once used in what is now Northern California.
-
C.
Miwok languages
Miwok languages are a group of closely related Native American languages traditionally spoken by the Miwok peoples of central and northern California.
-
D.
Central Pomo
chosen
Central Pomo is an indigenous Pomoan language variety traditionally spoken by the Pomo people of Northern California.
-
E.
Pomoan languages
The Pomoan languages are a group of closely related Indigenous languages traditionally spoken by the Pomo peoples of northern California.
- F. None of above.
- G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69b34543f06c8190915ebb1a4574ffa9 |
completed | March 12, 2026, 10:59 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69b34ffce3d8819083d2278547fa52c1 |
completed | March 12, 2026, 11:45 p.m. |
| NED1 | Entity disambiguation (via context triple) | batch_69b5db83dd308190a8d1824157d011ce |
completed | March 14, 2026, 10:04 p.m. |
Created at: March 12, 2026, 11:07 p.m.