Triple

T4267659
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject United States Supreme Court cases of the Burger Court E96863 entity
Predicate hasNotableCase P7437 FINISHED
Object Estelle v. Gamble E266470 NE FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Estelle v. Gamble | Statement: [United States Supreme Court cases of the Burger Court, hasNotableCase, Estelle v. Gamble]
NED1 Entity disambiguation (via context triple) gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07 
Target entity: Estelle v. Gamble
Context triple: [United States Supreme Court cases of the Burger Court, hasNotableCase, Estelle v. Gamble]
  • A. Estelle v. Gamble chosen
    Estelle v. Gamble is a landmark 1976 U.S. Supreme Court case that established that deliberate indifference to prisoners’ serious medical needs constitutes cruel and unusual punishment.
  • B. Lucas v. Earl
    Lucas v. Earl is a landmark 1930 U.S. Supreme Court tax law case that established the principle that income is taxed to the person who earns it, regardless of contractual arrangements to split or assign that income.
  • C. Hanna v. Plumer
    Hanna v. Plumer is a 1965 U.S. Supreme Court case that clarified the application of the Erie doctrine by holding that valid Federal Rules of Civil Procedure govern over conflicting state procedural laws in federal diversity actions.
  • D. Argersinger v. Hamlin
    Argersinger v. Hamlin is a 1972 U.S. Supreme Court case that extended the right to counsel to defendants in misdemeanor cases that may result in imprisonment.
  • E. Sherbert v. Verner
    Sherbert v. Verner is a landmark 1963 U.S. Supreme Court case that strengthened protections for religious liberty by requiring strict scrutiny of government actions that substantially burden individuals’ religious practices.
  • F. None of above.
  • G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69b34543f06c8190915ebb1a4574ffa9 completed March 12, 2026, 10:59 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69b34fce710481909d90ed4a3d150fde completed March 12, 2026, 11:44 p.m.
NED1 Entity disambiguation (via context triple) batch_69b5b79992a08190b614a89aa36cf674 completed March 14, 2026, 7:31 p.m.
Created at: March 12, 2026, 11:07 p.m.