Triple

T4250728
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Conde (Spain, Portugal) E95842 entity
Predicate titleGenderForm P1805 FINISHED
Object masculine LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: masculine | Statement: [Conde (Spain, Portugal), titleGenderForm, masculine]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: titleGenderForm
Context triple: [Conde (Spain, Portugal), titleGenderForm, masculine]
  • A. genderedFormOf
    Indicates that one term is a gender-specific variant or inflected form corresponding to another, more neutral or differently gendered term.
  • B. genderNeutralForm
    Indicates that one entity is a gender-neutral linguistic form or expression corresponding to another, more gendered form.
  • C. hasGenderedTitle chosen
    Indicates that an entity is associated with a title or form of address that is explicitly marked for a particular gender.
  • D. namedForGender
    Indicates that one entity is named in a way that reflects or is derived from a particular gender or gender-related characteristic of another entity.
  • E. genderConfiguration
    Indicates how the genders of the involved entities are arranged or combined within a particular relationship or context.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69b3453f759881909b91f01a1e82c036 completed March 12, 2026, 10:59 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69b34e9f11008190a0021e0ad730a79d completed March 12, 2026, 11:39 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69b347f73e008190a908a48ef389945a completed March 12, 2026, 11:10 p.m.
Created at: March 12, 2026, 11:06 p.m.