Triple
T4248986
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Alexander III of Scotland |
E95797
|
entity |
| Predicate | successorStateIssue |
P54940
|
FINISHED |
| Object | succession crisis after his death |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: succession crisis after his death | Statement: [Alexander III of Scotland, successorStateIssue, succession crisis after his death]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: successorStateIssue Context triple: [Alexander III of Scotland, successorStateIssue, succession crisis after his death]
-
A.
successorState
Indicates that one state directly follows another as the immediate next state in a sequence or process.
-
B.
successorThroughIssue
Indicates that one entity becomes the successor of another specifically through a line of descent or issue (i.e., through offspring).
-
C.
successorStateIndependenceFrom
Indicates that the resulting (successor) state of a system or process does not depend on a specified factor, condition, or prior state component.
-
D.
successorStateClaimedBy
Indicates that a particular state asserts itself as the legal or political successor to another state.
-
E.
successorStateForm
Indicates that one state or condition is the resulting or next state that directly follows another in a defined process or sequence.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (4 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69b3453f759881909b91f01a1e82c036 |
completed | March 12, 2026, 10:59 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69b34e9df10881908a2f039773f8afaa |
completed | March 12, 2026, 11:39 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69b347f73e008190a908a48ef389945a |
completed | March 12, 2026, 11:10 p.m. |
| PDg | Predicate description generation | batch_69b34e04ef1c81908bb34ae1cbfab1e6 |
completed | March 12, 2026, 11:36 p.m. |
Created at: March 12, 2026, 11:06 p.m.