Triple
T424881
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Chablis |
E8184
|
entity |
| Predicate | typicalAlcoholLevel |
P2071
|
FINISHED |
| Object | moderate |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: moderate | Statement: [Chablis, typicalAlcoholLevel, moderate]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: typicalAlcoholLevel Context triple: [Chablis, typicalAlcoholLevel, moderate]
-
A.
alcoholLevel
chosen
Indicates the measured concentration or amount of alcohol present in an entity (such as a person, substance, or environment).
-
B.
servesAlcohol
Indicates that an establishment or provider offers and supplies alcoholic beverages to customers or participants.
-
C.
traditionalDrink
Indicates that one entity is a beverage customarily consumed within the culture, heritage, or longstanding practices associated with another entity.
-
D.
tanninLevel
Indicates the degree or intensity of tannins present in or associated with something, typically a beverage like wine or tea.
-
E.
typicalDegree
Indicates the usual or characteristic level, intensity, or extent to which something holds or applies in a given context.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69a2e7f1d1bc81909cf2dc9754a3c334 |
completed | Feb. 28, 2026, 1:04 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69a2eed56ab481909eec289075496260 |
completed | Feb. 28, 2026, 1:34 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69a2edd6736c81909a6ca549f77b4345 |
completed | Feb. 28, 2026, 1:29 p.m. |
Created at: Feb. 28, 2026, 1:11 p.m.