Triple

T4245592
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Speaker of the Senate of Canada E95519 entity
Predicate mayVote P16242 FINISHED
Object to break a tie in certain circumstances LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: to break a tie in certain circumstances | Statement: [Speaker of the Senate of Canada, mayVote, to break a tie in certain circumstances]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: mayVote
Context triple: [Speaker of the Senate of Canada, mayVote, to break a tie in certain circumstances]
  • A. canVoteOn
    Indicates that an entity has the right or permission to participate in a decision-making process by casting a vote on a specific item, issue, or proposal.
  • B. votingAge
    Indicates the minimum age at which an individual is legally permitted to vote.
  • C. eligibleVoters
    Indicates that the referenced entities are legally permitted and qualified to vote in a given election or jurisdiction.
  • D. hadRightToElect
    Indicates that an entity possessed the legal or formal authority to choose or vote for another entity in an election or selection process.
  • E. mayHaveCastingVote chosen
    Indicates that an entity is permitted to exercise a casting (tie-breaking) vote in a decision-making process.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69b3453d91548190b4d4ef8fe52aa2ac completed March 12, 2026, 10:59 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69b34e8db5bc8190873c5ae3753aaa58 completed March 12, 2026, 11:38 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69b347f587148190a1830503459939b6 completed March 12, 2026, 11:10 p.m.
Created at: March 12, 2026, 11:05 p.m.