Triple

T4244629
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Angkor Wat E95497 entity
Predicate gridReferenceType P54915 FINISHED
Object temple-mountain layout LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: temple-mountain layout | Statement: [Angkor Wat, gridReferenceType, temple-mountain layout]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: gridReferenceType
Context triple: [Angkor Wat, gridReferenceType, temple-mountain layout]
  • A. hasOSGridReference
    Indicates that an entity is associated with a specific Ordnance Survey grid reference location.
  • B. refersToLocation
    Indicates that one entity designates, points to, or identifies a specific location associated with it.
  • C. isReferencePointFor
    Indicates that one entity serves as a positional or conceptual basis used to locate, measure, or interpret another entity.
  • D. referenceSurface
    Indicates that one entity serves as the surface or base relative to which another entity is positioned, aligned, or defined.
  • E. refersToGeographicFeature
    Indicates that one entity makes reference to, denotes, or is associated with a specific geographic feature such as a landform, body of water, or other physical location.
  • F. None of above. chosen

Provenance (4 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69b3453d91548190b4d4ef8fe52aa2ac completed March 12, 2026, 10:59 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69b34e8c42e88190b309a1ef7f6529ac completed March 12, 2026, 11:38 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69b347f587148190a1830503459939b6 completed March 12, 2026, 11:10 p.m.
PDg Predicate description generation batch_69b34e04ef1c81908bb34ae1cbfab1e6 completed March 12, 2026, 11:36 p.m.
Created at: March 12, 2026, 11:05 p.m.