Triple

T4233354
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Article 9 of the Genocide Convention E94632 entity
Predicate interpretedInCase P2252 FINISHED
Object The Gambia v. Myanmar E92421 NE FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: The Gambia v. Myanmar | Statement: [Article 9 of the Genocide Convention, interpretedInCase, The Gambia v. Myanmar]
NED1 Entity disambiguation (via context triple) gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: The Gambia v. Myanmar
Context triple: [Article 9 of the Genocide Convention, interpretedInCase, The Gambia v. Myanmar]
  • A. The Gambia v. Myanmar chosen
    The Gambia v. Myanmar is an ongoing case before the International Court of Justice in which The Gambia accuses Myanmar of violating the Genocide Convention through its treatment of the Rohingya population.
  • B. United Nations fact-finding mission on Myanmar
    The United Nations fact-finding mission on Myanmar was an independent UN investigative body established to examine and report on serious human rights violations and possible international crimes committed in Myanmar, particularly against the Rohingya population.
  • C. Prosecutor v. Jean-Paul Akayesu
    Prosecutor v. Jean-Paul Akayesu is a landmark international criminal case in which a Rwandan mayor was convicted of genocide and crimes against humanity, notably establishing rape as an act of genocide.
  • D. Namibia Advisory Opinion (Legal Consequences for States of the Continued Presence of South Africa in Namibia)
    The Namibia Advisory Opinion is a 1971 International Court of Justice ruling that declared South Africa’s continued presence in Namibia illegal and clarified the obligations of other states not to recognize or assist that situation.
  • E. Prosecutor v. Jean Kambanda
    Prosecutor v. Jean Kambanda is a landmark international criminal case in which former Rwandan Prime Minister Jean Kambanda was convicted and sentenced for his role in the 1994 Rwandan genocide.
  • F. None of above.
  • G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69b34537cc6481909cd0a96acbb33ef7 completed March 12, 2026, 10:59 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69b34e65720c819087c4022c774ff7c3 completed March 12, 2026, 11:38 p.m.
NED1 Entity disambiguation (via context triple) batch_69b596516fd88190b8497ccc7efc7f49 completed March 14, 2026, 5:09 p.m.
Created at: March 12, 2026, 11:05 p.m.