Triple
T4233352
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Article 9 of the Genocide Convention |
E94632
|
entity |
| Predicate | interpretedInCase |
P2252
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Bosnia and Herzegovina v. Serbia and Montenegro |
E76548
|
NE FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Bosnia and Herzegovina v. Serbia and Montenegro | Statement: [Article 9 of the Genocide Convention, interpretedInCase, Bosnia and Herzegovina v. Serbia and Montenegro]
NED1
Entity disambiguation (via context triple)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Bosnia and Herzegovina v. Serbia and Montenegro Context triple: [Article 9 of the Genocide Convention, interpretedInCase, Bosnia and Herzegovina v. Serbia and Montenegro]
-
A.
Bosnia and Herzegovina v. Serbia and Montenegro (ICJ, 2007)
chosen
Bosnia and Herzegovina v. Serbia and Montenegro (ICJ, 2007) is a landmark International Court of Justice judgment that addressed state responsibility for genocide during the Bosnian War, including the Srebrenica massacre, and clarified key obligations under the Genocide Convention.
-
B.
Croatia v. Serbia (ICJ, 2015)
Croatia v. Serbia (ICJ, 2015) is a landmark International Court of Justice case in which the Court adjudicated mutual genocide claims arising from the 1990s Yugoslav wars and clarified key aspects of state responsibility under the Genocide Convention.
-
C.
Prosecutor v. Krstić (ICTY)
Prosecutor v. Krstić (ICTY) is a landmark judgment of the International Criminal Tribunal for the former Yugoslavia that established the Srebrenica massacre as an act of genocide and clarified key legal standards for prosecuting genocide under international law.
-
D.
Court of Bosnia and Herzegovina
The Court of Bosnia and Herzegovina is the country’s highest-level state court, responsible for adjudicating complex criminal, administrative, and appellate cases, including war crimes and organized crime.
-
E.
Assembly of Kosovo
The Assembly of Kosovo is the unicameral parliamentary body that serves as the highest representative and lawmaking institution of Kosovo.
- F. None of above.
- G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69b34537cc6481909cd0a96acbb33ef7 |
completed | March 12, 2026, 10:59 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69b34e65720c819087c4022c774ff7c3 |
completed | March 12, 2026, 11:38 p.m. |
| NED1 | Entity disambiguation (via context triple) | batch_69b596516fd88190b8497ccc7efc7f49 |
completed | March 14, 2026, 5:09 p.m. |
Created at: March 12, 2026, 11:05 p.m.