Triple

T4214254
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Honda CR-V E93974 entity
Predicate competitor P1375 FINISHED
Object Mazda CX-5 E395831 NE FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Mazda CX-5 | Statement: [Honda CR-V, competitor, Mazda CX-5]
NED1 Entity disambiguation (via context triple) gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Mazda CX-5
Context triple: [Honda CR-V, competitor, Mazda CX-5]
  • A. Mazda CX-5 chosen
    The Mazda CX-5 is a compact crossover SUV known for its stylish design, engaging driving dynamics, and efficient Skyactiv technology.
  • B. Mazda CX-30
    The Mazda CX-30 is a compact crossover SUV known for its sleek design, upscale interior, and engaging driving dynamics within Mazda’s lineup.
  • C. Mazda CX-9
    The Mazda CX-9 is a mid-size three-row crossover SUV known for its stylish design, upscale interior, and engaging driving dynamics.
  • D. Mazda3
    The Mazda3 is a popular compact car known for its sporty handling, stylish design, and well-appointed interior.
  • E. Mazda6
    The Mazda6 is a mid-size family sedan known for its sporty handling, stylish design, and strong value in the mainstream car market.
  • F. None of above.
  • G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69b3451743608190808f41d17ccf2650 completed March 12, 2026, 10:58 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69b34be700908190a8cf5e3a27dad5bf completed March 12, 2026, 11:27 p.m.
NED1 Entity disambiguation (via context triple) batch_69b59634e52c81908cb967f124a96950 completed March 14, 2026, 5:09 p.m.
Created at: March 12, 2026, 11:04 p.m.