Triple

T4206312
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Mallord E93789 entity
Predicate distinctiveFor P18160 FINISHED
Object J. M. W. Turner’s full name LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: J. M. W. Turner’s full name | Statement: [Mallord, distinctiveFor, J. M. W. Turner’s full name]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: distinctiveFor
Context triple: [Mallord, distinctiveFor, J. M. W. Turner’s full name]
  • A. distinctiveMarking
    Indicates that one entity bears a unique or distinguishing visual feature or pattern that sets it apart from others.
  • B. distinction
    Indicates that one entity is recognized, treated, or classified as different or separate from another.
  • C. hasDistinctFeature chosen
    Indicates that an entity possesses a specific characteristic or attribute that differentiates it from others.
  • D. isDistinguishedBy
    Indicates that one entity is characterized or set apart from others by a particular feature, quality, or attribute.
  • E. isCeremoniallyDistinctFrom
    Indicates that two entities are formally separated or differentiated from each other within a ritual, ceremonial, or symbolic context.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69b3451743608190808f41d17ccf2650 completed March 12, 2026, 10:58 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69b34e098da881909a0cc339cc186627 completed March 12, 2026, 11:36 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69b347efd9b08190bb50f82e4e7fe06d completed March 12, 2026, 11:10 p.m.
Created at: March 12, 2026, 11:03 p.m.