Triple

T419557
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Regulation A E8069 entity
Predicate effectiveDateOfMajorAmendments P11741 FINISHED
Object June 2015 LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: June 2015 | Statement: [Regulation A, effectiveDateOfMajorAmendments, June 2015]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: effectiveDateOfMajorAmendments
Context triple: [Regulation A, effectiveDateOfMajorAmendments, June 2015]
  • A. majorAmendmentDate chosen
    Indicates the date on which a significant change or revision to something was formally made or took effect.
  • B. hasAmendments
    Indicates that one entity (such as a document, law, or agreement) includes or is associated with one or more modifications, changes, or additions made after its original creation.
  • C. dateOfEnactment
    Indicates the specific calendar date on which a law, regulation, or formal measure officially comes into force.
  • D. updatedSpecificationDate
    Indicates the date on which a specification was last revised or brought up to date.
  • E. amendedBy
    Indicates that one entity has been modified, revised, or updated as a result of changes made by another entity.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69a2e7f1d1bc81909cf2dc9754a3c334 completed Feb. 28, 2026, 1:04 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69a2eebde1d881908fb212bfba9d7c67 completed Feb. 28, 2026, 1:33 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69a2edd3b948819097d96c73d0a0f699 completed Feb. 28, 2026, 1:29 p.m.
Created at: Feb. 28, 2026, 1:11 p.m.