Triple
T4180981
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Oracle Team USA |
E88192
|
entity |
| Predicate | comebackFromDeficit |
P10850
|
FINISHED |
| Object | 1–8 to 9–8 in 2013 America’s Cup |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: 1–8 to 9–8 in 2013 America’s Cup | Statement: [Oracle Team USA, comebackFromDeficit, 1–8 to 9–8 in 2013 America’s Cup]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: comebackFromDeficit Context triple: [Oracle Team USA, comebackFromDeficit, 1–8 to 9–8 in 2013 America’s Cup]
-
A.
seriesDeficitOvercome
Indicates that a competitor or team has successfully come back from a losing position in a multi-game series to erase the deficit.
-
B.
comebackContext
Indicates the situational background, circumstances, or prior events that frame or motivate a comeback or return.
-
C.
teamInComeback
chosen
Indicates that a team participates in or is responsible for a comeback, overturning a losing or disadvantaged position.
-
D.
attemptedComebackSeason
Indicates that an entity made an effort to return to a previous level of performance or prominence after a period of decline or absence.
-
E.
opponentInComeback
Indicates that an entity serves as the opposing side or competitor in a situation characterized as a comeback (e.g., recovering from a disadvantage).
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69aed9477e8c81908bcb862d2db55b1d |
completed | March 9, 2026, 2:29 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69af07078cb081909f64326b12522410 |
completed | March 9, 2026, 5:44 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69af019155448190b19868583272513f |
completed | March 9, 2026, 5:21 p.m. |
Created at: March 9, 2026, 3:45 p.m.