Triple
T4169954
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Cold War rhetoric |
E84538
|
entity |
| Predicate | employsDevice |
P9919
|
FINISHED |
| Object | demonization of the enemy |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: demonization of the enemy | Statement: [Cold War rhetoric, employsDevice, demonization of the enemy]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: employsDevice Context triple: [Cold War rhetoric, employsDevice, demonization of the enemy]
-
A.
usesDevice
chosen
Indicates that one entity operates, employs, or relies on a particular device to perform an action or achieve a purpose.
-
B.
usesEquipment
Indicates that an entity employs or operates a particular piece of equipment to perform an action or fulfill a function.
-
C.
testedDevice
Indicates that one entity has performed a test on, or experimentally evaluated, another entity as a device.
-
D.
requiresDevice
Indicates that performing the specified action or relationship is contingent on the presence or use of a particular device.
-
E.
device
Indicates that one entity is a device used, controlled, or referenced by another entity in the relationship.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69aed932cab48190b80ffe35f7029ae1 |
completed | March 9, 2026, 2:29 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69af02c730b081908b19e6a4aea1549b |
completed | March 9, 2026, 5:26 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69af018fb0948190a9701b2e8e5d9bac |
completed | March 9, 2026, 5:21 p.m. |
Created at: March 9, 2026, 3:44 p.m.