Triple

T4165850
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject ZF E84442 entity
Predicate hasUndecidableStatement P54445 FINISHED
Object continuum hypothesis LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: continuum hypothesis | Statement: [ZF, hasUndecidableStatement, continuum hypothesis]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hasUndecidableStatement
Context triple: [ZF, hasUndecidableStatement, continuum hypothesis]
  • A. provedUndecidableUsing
    Indicates that the undecidability of one problem, theory, or statement was established by applying or reducing it to another specific method, result, or formal system.
  • B. hasUncertainty
    Indicates that the relationship or value is associated with some level or type of uncertainty rather than being fully definite or precise.
  • C. hasUnknown
    Indicates that an entity possesses or is associated with information, attributes, or values that are not known or not specified.
  • D. hasDecisionPoint
    Indicates that there is a specific moment or juncture at which a choice between alternative options or paths must be made.
  • E. hasNotableDecision
    Indicates that an entity is associated with a specific decision that is considered significant or noteworthy in some context.
  • F. None of above. chosen

Provenance (4 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69aed932cab48190b80ffe35f7029ae1 completed March 9, 2026, 2:29 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69af02ac8e788190a8f3563a2903bbad completed March 9, 2026, 5:26 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69af018fb0948190a9701b2e8e5d9bac completed March 9, 2026, 5:21 p.m.
PDg Predicate description generation batch_69af01ee94ec8190aa6dde54d4571c04 completed March 9, 2026, 5:22 p.m.
Created at: March 9, 2026, 3:44 p.m.