Triple

T4157383
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Panopticon; or, The Inspection-House E91448 entity
Predicate proposesUseIn P34894 FINISHED
Object prisons LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: prisons | Statement: [Panopticon; or, The Inspection-House, proposesUseIn, prisons]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: proposesUseIn
Context triple: [Panopticon; or, The Inspection-House, proposesUseIn, prisons]
  • A. recommendsUseOf chosen
    Indicates that one entity advises, endorses, or suggests the use of another entity as appropriate or beneficial in a given context.
  • B. proposes
    Indicates that one entity formally suggests or puts forward an idea, plan, or course of action to another entity for consideration or approval.
  • C. plannedUseOf
    Indicates that one entity is intended or designated to be used for a specific purpose, function, or activity involving another entity.
  • D. areUsedIn
    Indicates that certain entities serve as components, tools, or resources within a particular process, context, or application.
  • E. usedFor
    Indicates that one entity serves a purpose, function, or role in accomplishing, enabling, or supporting another entity or activity.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69aed9626ebc8190a39de631788bea3e completed March 9, 2026, 2:29 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69af0321eee88190871c1d4bf44a5007 completed March 9, 2026, 5:28 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69af018dc90c8190a754b1bfbc802e80 completed March 9, 2026, 5:21 p.m.
Created at: March 9, 2026, 3:44 p.m.