Triple

T4153313
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Commander, Third Fleet E89957 entity
Predicate notableCommanderRank P30999 FINISHED
Object Admiral LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Admiral | Statement: [Commander, Third Fleet, notableCommanderRank, Admiral]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: notableCommanderRank
Context triple: [Commander, Third Fleet, notableCommanderRank, Admiral]
  • A. notableCommanderUnder
    Indicates that one entity served as a notable military commander under the authority or leadership of another entity.
  • B. notableCommanderOf
    Indicates that an individual is a distinguished or historically significant commander associated with leading a particular military unit, force, or organization.
  • C. hasCommanderRank chosen
    Indicates that an entity holds the military or organizational rank of commander within a specified hierarchy or context.
  • D. commanderInChiefRank
    Indicates that an entity holds the highest-ranking leadership position over a military or armed forces organization.
  • E. notableCommanderSide
    Indicates that a particular military or strategic side is notably commanded or led by a specified commander.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69aed95a59a881909b26e70b42c6811a completed March 9, 2026, 2:29 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69af033ef6648190adde17f943d89c78 completed March 9, 2026, 5:28 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69af018c101081909070da5b11e5eb3d completed March 9, 2026, 5:21 p.m.
Created at: March 9, 2026, 3:44 p.m.