Triple
T4111285
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | What Remains of Edith Finch |
E88576
|
entity |
| Predicate | metacriticCategory |
P54693
|
FINISHED |
| Object | universal acclaim |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: universal acclaim | Statement: [What Remains of Edith Finch, metacriticCategory, universal acclaim]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: metacriticCategory Context triple: [What Remains of Edith Finch, metacriticCategory, universal acclaim]
-
A.
hasMetascore
Indicates that an entity is associated with a Metascore rating, typically representing an aggregated critical review score.
-
B.
hasMetacriticId
Indicates that an entity is associated with a specific identifier used by Metacritic to reference it in their database.
-
C.
hasRottenTomatoesRating
Indicates that an entity has an associated rating value assigned by Rotten Tomatoes.
-
D.
movementCritic
Indicates a relationship where one entity critiques, evaluates, or expresses disapproval of a particular movement (such as a social, political, or artistic movement).
-
E.
hasRottenTomatoesEntry
Indicates that there exists a Rotten Tomatoes database entry corresponding to the given entity.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (4 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69aed9484fb881909146f4c772ad277c |
completed | March 9, 2026, 2:29 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69af03d7240c8190a64dcbc669772808 |
completed | March 9, 2026, 5:31 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69af0183eb84819087d7184de28f5514 |
completed | March 9, 2026, 5:21 p.m. |
| PDg | Predicate description generation | batch_69af03d5cce88190ad53bc6cfe10b21e |
completed | March 9, 2026, 5:31 p.m. |
Created at: March 9, 2026, 3:41 p.m.