Triple
T4107337
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Coosa County, Alabama |
E88484
|
entity |
| Predicate | hasSettlement |
P1068
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Goodwater, Alabama |
E433610
|
NE FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Goodwater, Alabama | Statement: [Coosa County, Alabama, hasSettlement, Goodwater, Alabama]
NED1
Entity disambiguation (via context triple)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Goodwater, Alabama Context triple: [Coosa County, Alabama, hasSettlement, Goodwater, Alabama]
-
A.
Goodwater, Alabama
chosen
Goodwater, Alabama is a small city that serves as the largest municipality in Coosa County in the central part of the state.
-
B.
Waverly, Alabama
Waverly, Alabama is a small rural town in eastern Alabama known for its tight-knit community and historic Southern character.
-
C.
Riverside, Alabama
Riverside, Alabama is a small community in St. Clair County known for its location along the Coosa River in central Alabama.
-
D.
Odenville, Alabama
Odenville, Alabama is a small town in central Alabama known for its rural character and location within the Birmingham metropolitan area.
-
E.
Townley, Alabama
Townley, Alabama is a small unincorporated community located in Walker County in the north-central part of the state.
- F. None of above.
- G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69aed9484fb881909146f4c772ad277c |
completed | March 9, 2026, 2:29 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69af019e23c481909578eba1c9270282 |
completed | March 9, 2026, 5:21 p.m. |
| NED1 | Entity disambiguation (via context triple) | batch_69b5f5a4f75481909236504eaf81ce33 |
completed | March 14, 2026, 11:56 p.m. |
Created at: March 9, 2026, 3:40 p.m.