Triple
T410571
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Canons of Dort |
E9480
|
entity |
| Predicate | formulatedInYear |
P13128
|
FINISHED |
| Object | 1619 |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: 1619 | Statement: [Canons of Dort, formulatedInYear, 1619]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: formulatedInYear Context triple: [Canons of Dort, formulatedInYear, 1619]
-
A.
formulatedIn
Indicates that something was created, developed, or expressed within a particular context, place, or framework.
-
B.
wasInventedInYear
Indicates that an entity was created or invented in a specific calendar year.
-
C.
introducedInYear
Indicates the year in which something was first introduced, launched, or made available.
-
D.
formedInYear
Indicates the year in which an entity was originally established, created, or came into existence.
-
E.
hasFormulation
Indicates that one entity is expressed, prepared, or configured in a particular form or composition defined by another entity.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (4 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69a2e80111fc8190961d5b7c6154123f |
completed | Feb. 28, 2026, 1:05 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69a2ed31681c8190ac32334562fb17fd |
completed | Feb. 28, 2026, 1:27 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69a2e9737694819080fde9adcc1aa4d4 |
completed | Feb. 28, 2026, 1:11 p.m. |
| PDg | Predicate description generation | batch_69a2ed3032148190beb3a516e437f8f8 |
completed | Feb. 28, 2026, 1:27 p.m. |
Created at: Feb. 28, 2026, 1:09 p.m.