Triple
T4103412
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Jasper County, Iowa |
E88392
|
entity |
| Predicate | largestCity |
P235
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Newton, Iowa |
E413842
|
NE FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Newton, Iowa | Statement: [Jasper County, Iowa, largestCity, Newton, Iowa]
NED1
Entity disambiguation (via context triple)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Newton, Iowa Context triple: [Jasper County, Iowa, largestCity, Newton, Iowa]
-
A.
Newton, Iowa
chosen
Newton, Iowa is a small central Iowa city known historically for its manufacturing industry, particularly as the former headquarters of the Maytag Corporation.
-
B.
Washington, Iowa
Washington, Iowa is a small city in southeastern Iowa known for its historic downtown, agricultural surroundings, and role as a local commercial and cultural hub.
-
C.
Nashua, Iowa
Nashua, Iowa is a small city in northeastern Iowa known for its rural community character and proximity to the Cedar River.
-
D.
Hartford, Iowa
Hartford, Iowa is a small city in south-central Iowa that forms part of the Des Moines metropolitan area.
-
E.
Columbia, Iowa
Columbia, Iowa is a small unincorporated rural community located in Marion County in the U.S. state of Iowa.
- F. None of above.
- G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69aed9484fb881909146f4c772ad277c |
completed | March 9, 2026, 2:29 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69aefd116dac8190952cb2ddf63216ec |
completed | March 9, 2026, 5:02 p.m. |
| NED1 | Entity disambiguation (via context triple) | batch_69b576a3e75c8190ab08954220b4b89a |
completed | March 14, 2026, 2:54 p.m. |
Created at: March 9, 2026, 3:40 p.m.