Triple
T409193
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | APEC Ministerial Meeting |
E9448
|
entity |
| Predicate | isNonBinding |
P13096
|
FINISHED |
| Object | true |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: true | Statement: [APEC Ministerial Meeting, isNonBinding, true]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: isNonBinding Context triple: [APEC Ministerial Meeting, isNonBinding, true]
-
A.
hasBindingEnergy
Indicates that one entity possesses or is characterized by a specific amount of binding energy associated with its formation or stability.
-
B.
isNotRequiredFor
Indicates that one entity is not necessary or mandatory for the existence, occurrence, validity, or completion of another entity or process.
-
C.
bindingOn
Indicates that one party is legally or formally obligated to follow, accept, or be governed by a decision, rule, or agreement established by another.
-
D.
hasNonStandardForm
Indicates that an entity possesses a form, variant, or representation that deviates from the standard, canonical, or commonly accepted form.
-
E.
isNonNegative
Indicates that a value is greater than or equal to zero.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (4 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69a2e80111fc8190961d5b7c6154123f |
completed | Feb. 28, 2026, 1:05 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69a2ed31681c8190ac32334562fb17fd |
completed | Feb. 28, 2026, 1:27 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69a2e9737694819080fde9adcc1aa4d4 |
completed | Feb. 28, 2026, 1:11 p.m. |
| PDg | Predicate description generation | batch_69a2ed3032148190beb3a516e437f8f8 |
completed | Feb. 28, 2026, 1:27 p.m. |
Created at: Feb. 28, 2026, 1:08 p.m.