Triple
T4089323
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Affordable Care Act |
E87665
|
entity |
| Predicate | legalChallenge |
P3996
|
FINISHED |
| Object | National Federation of Independent Business v. Sebelius |
E13966
|
NE FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: National Federation of Independent Business v. Sebelius | Statement: [Affordable Care Act, legalChallenge, National Federation of Independent Business v. Sebelius]
NED1
Entity disambiguation (via context triple)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: National Federation of Independent Business v. Sebelius Context triple: [Affordable Care Act, legalChallenge, National Federation of Independent Business v. Sebelius]
-
A.
NFIB v. Sebelius
chosen
NFIB v. Sebelius is the landmark 2012 U.S. Supreme Court case that largely upheld the Affordable Care Act, notably ruling that its individual mandate could be sustained under Congress’s taxing power.
-
B.
King v. Burwell
King v. Burwell is a landmark 2015 U.S. Supreme Court case that upheld the availability of federal tax credits for health insurance purchased on exchanges under the Affordable Care Act.
-
C.
Burwell v. Hobby Lobby Stores, Inc.
Burwell v. Hobby Lobby Stores, Inc. is a 2014 U.S. Supreme Court case in which the Court held that closely held for-profit corporations can claim religious exemptions from certain federal regulations under the Religious Freedom Restoration Act.
-
D.
Whole Woman’s Health v. Hellerstedt
Whole Woman’s Health v. Hellerstedt is a 2016 U.S. Supreme Court decision that struck down Texas abortion restrictions as imposing an undue burden on women’s constitutional right to access abortion.
-
E.
Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission
Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission is a landmark 2010 U.S. Supreme Court case that dramatically expanded the political spending rights of corporations and unions by treating such expenditures as protected speech.
- F. None of above.
- G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69aed94425148190be337845d56fac22 |
completed | March 9, 2026, 2:29 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69aefca9e9088190a97cb2ccb5d622f0 |
completed | March 9, 2026, 5 p.m. |
| NED1 | Entity disambiguation (via context triple) | batch_69b56b6651d48190915581eca783cf3b |
completed | March 14, 2026, 2:06 p.m. |
Created at: March 9, 2026, 3:39 p.m.