Triple

T4075742
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Judiciary of Indiana E86759 entity
Predicate oversees P46 FINISHED
Object Indiana judicial discipline
Indiana judicial discipline is the system of rules, procedures, and oversight mechanisms that govern the ethical conduct and accountability of judges within the state of Indiana.
 E411453 NE FINISHED

How this triple was built (4 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Indiana judicial discipline | Statement: [Judiciary of Indiana, oversees, Indiana judicial discipline]
NED1 Entity disambiguation (via context triple) gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07 
Target entity: Indiana judicial discipline
Context triple: [Judiciary of Indiana, oversees, Indiana judicial discipline]
  • A. Commission on Judicial Performance
    The Commission on Judicial Performance is California’s independent state agency responsible for investigating complaints of judicial misconduct and disciplining judges to maintain integrity and public confidence in the judiciary.
  • B. Pennsylvania Court of Judicial Discipline
    The Pennsylvania Court of Judicial Discipline is a specialized state tribunal that hears and decides cases involving alleged misconduct or ethical violations by judges in Pennsylvania.
  • C. Judiciary of Indiana
    The Judiciary of Indiana is the state’s court system responsible for interpreting Indiana law and administering justice through its network of trial and appellate courts.
  • D. Michigan Court System
    The Michigan Court System is the statewide judicial branch responsible for interpreting and applying Michigan law through a hierarchy of trial and appellate courts.
  • E. Arizona judicial conduct and discipline system
    The Arizona judicial conduct and discipline system is the framework of bodies and procedures responsible for investigating, evaluating, and, when necessary, sanctioning judges in Arizona to uphold judicial ethics and public confidence in the courts.
  • F. None of above. chosen
  • G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
NEDg Description generation gpt-5.1
Instruction
Generate a one-sentence description of the target entity. 
You are given a context triple in the form (subject, predicate, object), where the object is the target entity. 
# Instructions
Use the triple to infer relevant information about the entity. Describe the entity based on what is most defining, well-known. 
Avoid repeating the information from the triple, unless really essential.
# Response Format
Return only the sentence: "Description: [one-sentence description of the target entity]"
Input
Entity: Indiana judicial discipline
Triple: [Judiciary of Indiana, oversees, Indiana judicial discipline]
Generated description
Indiana judicial discipline is the system of rules, procedures, and oversight mechanisms that govern the ethical conduct and accountability of judges within the state of Indiana.
NED2 Entity disambiguation (via description) gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07 
Target entity: Indiana judicial discipline
Target entity description: Indiana judicial discipline is the system of rules, procedures, and oversight mechanisms that govern the ethical conduct and accountability of judges within the state of Indiana.
  • A. Commission on Judicial Performance
    The Commission on Judicial Performance is California’s independent state agency responsible for investigating complaints of judicial misconduct and disciplining judges to maintain integrity and public confidence in the judiciary.
  • B. Pennsylvania Court of Judicial Discipline
    The Pennsylvania Court of Judicial Discipline is a specialized state tribunal that hears and decides cases involving alleged misconduct or ethical violations by judges in Pennsylvania.
  • C. Judiciary of Indiana
    The Judiciary of Indiana is the state’s court system responsible for interpreting Indiana law and administering justice through its network of trial and appellate courts.
  • D. Michigan Court System
    The Michigan Court System is the statewide judicial branch responsible for interpreting and applying Michigan law through a hierarchy of trial and appellate courts.
  • E. Arizona judicial conduct and discipline system
    The Arizona judicial conduct and discipline system is the framework of bodies and procedures responsible for investigating, evaluating, and, when necessary, sanctioning judges in Arizona to uphold judicial ethics and public confidence in the courts.
  • F. None of above. chosen

Provenance (5 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69aed93ebe448190a1f1686e28740ac9 completed March 9, 2026, 2:29 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69aefc25e2e08190b3c048e1b8f85bbf completed March 9, 2026, 4:58 p.m.
NED1 Entity disambiguation (via context triple) batch_69b562bc05948190a9ad709768420588 completed March 14, 2026, 1:29 p.m.
NEDg Description generation batch_69b563b5cc108190bb9684abafa608af completed March 14, 2026, 1:33 p.m.
NED2 Entity disambiguation (via description) batch_69b5646606f08190930451ac372154cd completed March 14, 2026, 1:36 p.m.
Created at: March 9, 2026, 3:39 p.m.