Triple
T4064252
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | A Display of Arminianism |
E86286
|
entity |
| Predicate | doctrinalPositionDefended |
P11302
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Reformed orthodoxy |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Reformed orthodoxy | Statement: [A Display of Arminianism, doctrinalPositionDefended, Reformed orthodoxy]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: doctrinalPositionDefended Context triple: [A Display of Arminianism, doctrinalPositionDefended, Reformed orthodoxy]
-
A.
doctrinalStance
chosen
Indicates the specific set of doctrines, beliefs, or official teachings that an entity adheres to or promotes.
-
B.
theologicalDefenseBy
Indicates a relationship where one entity provides a theological justification, argument, or defense on behalf of another entity, doctrine, or position.
-
C.
doctrinalSignificance
Indicates the importance or impact that a doctrine or set of teachings has within a particular religious, legal, or ideological system.
-
D.
doctrinalConcern
Indicates a relationship where one party has a worry, objection, or issue specifically about the correctness or acceptability of another party’s doctrines or teachings.
-
E.
doctrinalOppositionFrom
Indicates a relationship where one party holds or expresses doctrinal disagreement or opposition toward another party or their teachings.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69aed93c69208190a4efac0efe3cd69b |
completed | March 9, 2026, 2:29 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69aefd0bdea48190805a79515ee92709 |
completed | March 9, 2026, 5:02 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69aef90438908190a005b08ba271eacf |
completed | March 9, 2026, 4:44 p.m. |
Created at: March 9, 2026, 3:38 p.m.