Triple

T400484
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject CPython E9268 entity
Predicate hasInterface P12981 FINISHED
Object command-line interpreter (REPL) LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: command-line interpreter (REPL) | Statement: [CPython, hasInterface, command-line interpreter (REPL)]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hasInterface
Context triple: [CPython, hasInterface, command-line interpreter (REPL)]
  • A. hasFeature
    Indicates that an entity possesses, exhibits, or includes a particular characteristic, attribute, or component.
  • B. hasSupported
    Indicates that one entity has provided assistance, endorsement, or backing to another entity, either materially, emotionally, or through advocacy.
  • C. hasServiceClass
    Indicates that an entity is associated with, or categorized under, a particular class or type of service.
  • D. hasNotableImplementationAt
    Indicates that something has a significant or noteworthy implementation located at or associated with a particular place, context, or platform.
  • E. canBeImplementedWith
    Indicates that one entity is capable of being realized, executed, or fulfilled through the use or application of another entity.
  • F. None of above. chosen

Provenance (4 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69a2e8004cb88190b92ed1add6abf41a completed Feb. 28, 2026, 1:05 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69a2ec8e655c819081eff85c0ef55fa5 completed Feb. 28, 2026, 1:24 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69a2e96ee4ec8190a5c0e3f491d3963d completed Feb. 28, 2026, 1:11 p.m.
PDg Predicate description generation batch_69a2eb7c56bc8190ab787801af2eec8d completed Feb. 28, 2026, 1:19 p.m.
Created at: Feb. 28, 2026, 1:08 p.m.