Triple

Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).

Phrase: United Public Workers of America (C.I.O.) v. Mitchell | Statement: [United Public Workers v. Mitchell, fullName, United Public Workers of America (C.I.O.) v. Mitchell]

Target entity: United Public Workers of America (C.I.O.) v. Mitchell
Context triple: [United Public Workers v. Mitchell, fullName, United Public Workers of America (C.I.O.) v. Mitchell]

• A. United Public Workers v. Mitchell chosen
  United Public Workers v. Mitchell is a 1947 U.S. Supreme Court case that upheld the constitutionality of the Hatch Act’s restrictions on federal employees’ political activities.
• B. Hague v. CIO
  Hague v. CIO is a 1939 U.S. Supreme Court case that significantly shaped First Amendment jurisprudence by affirming protections for public assembly and speech in public forums.
• C. NLRB v. Jones & Laughlin Steel Corp.
  NLRB v. Jones & Laughlin Steel Corp. is a landmark 1937 U.S. Supreme Court decision that upheld federal power to regulate labor relations, marking a major expansion of Congress’s authority over interstate commerce.
• D. Mitchell v. United States
  Mitchell v. United States is a U.S. Supreme Court case addressing the scope of Fifth Amendment protections, particularly concerning a defendant’s right against self-incrimination at sentencing.
• E. United States v. Darby
  United States v. Darby is a 1941 U.S. Supreme Court case that upheld federal labor regulations under the Commerce Clause and marked a broad expansion of federal power over economic activity.
• F. None of above.
• G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.