Triple

T3990842
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Marshall Court era E86985 entity
Predicate hasKeyDecision P53704 FINISHED
Object Dartmouth College v. Woodward E79731 NE FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Dartmouth College v. Woodward | Statement: [Marshall Court era, hasKeyDecision, Dartmouth College v. Woodward]
NED1 Entity disambiguation (via context triple) gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07 
Target entity: Dartmouth College v. Woodward
Context triple: [Marshall Court era, hasKeyDecision, Dartmouth College v. Woodward]
  • A. Dartmouth College v. Woodward chosen
    Dartmouth College v. Woodward is an 1819 U.S. Supreme Court case that established the protection of corporate charters as contracts under the Constitution, limiting states’ power to alter them.
  • B. Grove City College v. Bell
    Grove City College v. Bell is a 1984 U.S. Supreme Court case that significantly narrowed the scope of Title IX’s application to only those specific programs directly receiving federal funds, prompting later legislative action to restore broader coverage.
  • C. Students for Fair Admissions v. President and Fellows of Harvard College
    Students for Fair Admissions v. President and Fellows of Harvard College is a landmark 2023 U.S. Supreme Court case that sharply limited the use of race-conscious admissions policies in higher education, effectively ending affirmative action programs at colleges and universities nationwide.
  • D. Cooley v. Board of Wardens
    Cooley v. Board of Wardens is an 1852 U.S. Supreme Court decision that helped define the scope of the Commerce Clause by allowing states to regulate certain local aspects of commerce, such as port pilotage, without violating federal authority.
  • E. Chaplinsky v. New Hampshire
    Chaplinsky v. New Hampshire is a 1942 U.S. Supreme Court case that established the "fighting words" doctrine, holding that certain personally abusive epithets are not protected by the First Amendment.
  • F. None of above.
  • G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69aed93fd9d4819085d3b2137d2346cb completed March 9, 2026, 2:29 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69af0197a0a0819085d746f51c7fc51b completed March 9, 2026, 5:21 p.m.
NED1 Entity disambiguation (via context triple) batch_69b54035e92c81909dc2be18719b062c completed March 14, 2026, 11:02 a.m.
Created at: March 9, 2026, 3:33 p.m.