Triple

T3990840
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Marshall Court era E86985 entity
Predicate hasKeyDecision P53704 FINISHED
Object Cohens v. Virginia E80859 NE FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Cohens v. Virginia | Statement: [Marshall Court era, hasKeyDecision, Cohens v. Virginia]
NED1 Entity disambiguation (via context triple) gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07 
Target entity: Cohens v. Virginia
Context triple: [Marshall Court era, hasKeyDecision, Cohens v. Virginia]
  • A. Cohens v. Virginia chosen
    Cohens v. Virginia is an 1821 U.S. Supreme Court case that affirmed the Court’s authority to review state criminal proceedings involving federal law, strengthening federal judicial power over the states.
  • B. Paul v. Virginia
    Paul v. Virginia is an 1869 U.S. Supreme Court decision that held corporations are not “citizens” under the Constitution’s Privileges and Immunities Clause, allowing states to regulate foreign insurance companies.
  • C. Morgan v. Virginia
    Morgan v. Virginia was a 1946 U.S. Supreme Court case that struck down state laws mandating racial segregation on interstate buses, laying important groundwork for later civil rights actions.
  • D. Chisholm v. Georgia
    Chisholm v. Georgia was a 1793 U.S. Supreme Court case that held a state could be sued in federal court by a citizen of another state, a ruling that led directly to the adoption of the Eleventh Amendment limiting such suits.
  • E. Martin v. Hunter's Lessee
    Martin v. Hunter's Lessee is an 1816 U.S. Supreme Court case that established the Court's authority to review state court decisions on federal law, reinforcing federal judicial supremacy.
  • F. None of above.
  • G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69aed93fd9d4819085d3b2137d2346cb completed March 9, 2026, 2:29 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69af0197a0a0819085d746f51c7fc51b completed March 9, 2026, 5:21 p.m.
NED1 Entity disambiguation (via context triple) batch_69b54035e92c81909dc2be18719b062c completed March 14, 2026, 11:02 a.m.
Created at: March 9, 2026, 3:33 p.m.