Triple

T3970450
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Same Old Man E92318 entity
Predicate hasTrackSequenceRelation P25512 FINISHED
Object track on the album Have One on Me LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: track on the album Have One on Me | Statement: [Same Old Man, hasTrackSequenceRelation, track on the album Have One on Me]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hasTrackSequenceRelation
Context triple: [Same Old Man, hasTrackSequenceRelation, track on the album Have One on Me]
  • A. hasTrack
    Indicates that one entity possesses, includes, or is associated with a specific track (such as a path, course, or recorded item).
  • B. followsInTracklist chosen
    Indicates that one item directly comes after another in an ordered tracklist sequence.
  • C. isTrackedBy
    Indicates that an entity’s state, behavior, or changes are being monitored, recorded, or followed by another entity.
  • D. hasGenerationRelationship
    Indicates that one entity is involved in producing, creating, or giving rise to another entity.
  • E. trackPattern
    Indicates that one entity follows, monitors, or records the behavior or state of another according to a defined pattern or sequence.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69aed96624188190ac8c45bb57ab72b5 completed March 9, 2026, 2:29 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69aefaca33e4819091957c7915857a42 completed March 9, 2026, 4:52 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69aef8f252b081909749d40440d372b2 completed March 9, 2026, 4:44 p.m.
Created at: March 9, 2026, 3:32 p.m.